<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sufism Is An Obligation on Muslims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/sufism-is-an-obligation-on-muslims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/sufism-is-an-obligation-on-muslims/</link>
	<description>The Travelogues of a Traveler</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Saifuddin</title>
		<link>http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/sufism-is-an-obligation-on-muslims/#comment-26145</link>
		<dc:creator>Saifuddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-26145</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;BismillaharRahmanirRahim

as-salaamu 'alaikum&lt;/i&gt; Bubbles. Indeed, this is what I thought I implied by citing Abu Hanifa (ra) and Hanafi scholar, Shaykh Ahmad al-Farooqi Sirhindi (ks) also known as Imam Rabbani when you wrote,

&lt;blockquote&gt;"I understood it as an exhortation from the Iman to his followers..."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bubbles and omyma if I was unclear about the nature of my position concerning the text, please accept my humblest regrets. And now that we have established some common ground, it seems to me what we should be looking into is whether or not other &lt;i&gt;madhahib&lt;/i&gt; are saying the same as Abu Hanifa (ra)? For example, on this issue in particular, concerning the eight branches of Tradition Islamic Sciences, &lt;i&gt;Al-’Ulum an-Naqliyya&lt;/i&gt;, what are Imam Malik (ra); Imam Shafi'i (ra) and Imam Hanbal (ra) saying of &lt;i&gt;tasawwuf&lt;/i&gt; and the conditions (&lt;i&gt;ahkam&lt;/i&gt;) for study (&lt;i&gt;fard, wajib, mustahabb&lt;/i&gt;, etc.)? 

Bubbles you are correct, what Abu Hanifa (ra) said of &lt;i&gt;tasawwuf&lt;/i&gt; may not necessarily be "taken to apply by all Muslims". However, the conditions (&lt;em&gt;ahkam&lt;/em&gt;) placed on the study of &lt;i&gt;tasawwuf&lt;/i&gt; with respect to the &lt;i&gt;madhahib&lt;/i&gt; is relevant to all Sunni Muslims and worth investigating. Because whether one is &lt;i&gt;Sufi&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;Salafi&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salafiyya#Madh.27hab" rel="nofollow"&gt;Salafis follow a &lt;i&gt;madhhab&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;), the four &lt;i&gt;madhahib&lt;/i&gt; are still relevant and the preferred method for "correct guidance" according to the majority of Islamic Scholars. That is unless you are rejecting the &lt;i&gt;madhahib&lt;/i&gt; and taking on the course of those against the traditional schools of Islamic thought, &lt;i&gt;al-La Madhhabiyya&lt;/i&gt;.

-Saifuddin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>BismillaharRahmanirRahim</p>
<p>as-salaamu &#8216;alaikum</i> Bubbles. Indeed, this is what I thought I implied by citing Abu Hanifa (ra) and Hanafi scholar, Shaykh Ahmad al-Farooqi Sirhindi (ks) also known as Imam Rabbani when you wrote,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I understood it as an exhortation from the Iman to his followers&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Bubbles and omyma if I was unclear about the nature of my position concerning the text, please accept my humblest regrets. And now that we have established some common ground, it seems to me what we should be looking into is whether or not other <i>madhahib</i> are saying the same as Abu Hanifa (ra)? For example, on this issue in particular, concerning the eight branches of Tradition Islamic Sciences, <i>Al-’Ulum an-Naqliyya</i>, what are Imam Malik (ra); Imam Shafi&#8217;i (ra) and Imam Hanbal (ra) saying of <i>tasawwuf</i> and the conditions (<i>ahkam</i>) for study (<i>fard, wajib, mustahabb</i>, etc.)? </p>
<p>Bubbles you are correct, what Abu Hanifa (ra) said of <i>tasawwuf</i> may not necessarily be &#8220;taken to apply by all Muslims&#8221;. However, the conditions (<em>ahkam</em>) placed on the study of <i>tasawwuf</i> with respect to the <i>madhahib</i> is relevant to all Sunni Muslims and worth investigating. Because whether one is <i>Sufi</i> or <i>Salafi</i> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salafiyya#Madh.27hab" rel="nofollow">Salafis follow a <i>madhhab</i></a>), the four <i>madhahib</i> are still relevant and the preferred method for &#8220;correct guidance&#8221; according to the majority of Islamic Scholars. That is unless you are rejecting the <i>madhahib</i> and taking on the course of those against the traditional schools of Islamic thought, <i>al-La Madhhabiyya</i>.</p>
<p>-Saifuddin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubbles</title>
		<link>http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/sufism-is-an-obligation-on-muslims/#comment-26143</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-26143</guid>
		<description>Omyma, I understood it as an exhortation from the Iman to his followers alone, because then if taken to apply to all Muslims then it is contrary to what the Rasul (pbuh) and what Allah asks. 

Even in the famous hadith 'to seek Knowledge all the way to China' it didn't say it was a sin not to seek a particular knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omyma, I understood it as an exhortation from the Iman to his followers alone, because then if taken to apply to all Muslims then it is contrary to what the Rasul (pbuh) and what Allah asks. </p>
<p>Even in the famous hadith &#8216;to seek Knowledge all the way to China&#8217; it didn&#8217;t say it was a sin not to seek a particular knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omyma</title>
		<link>http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/sufism-is-an-obligation-on-muslims/#comment-26142</link>
		<dc:creator>omyma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 07:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-26142</guid>
		<description>if "as much as necessary" leads to an understanding that this passage only encourages - albeit very strongly - believers to learn all aspects of their religion, then so be it.

but if it means that one must delve into various sects and become a part of a sufi path and follow a particular leader or "father", for example, then this is definitely not what Allah asked us to do</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if &#8220;as much as necessary&#8221; leads to an understanding that this passage only encourages - albeit very strongly - believers to learn all aspects of their religion, then so be it.</p>
<p>but if it means that one must delve into various sects and become a part of a sufi path and follow a particular leader or &#8220;father&#8221;, for example, then this is definitely not what Allah asked us to do</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saifuddin</title>
		<link>http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/sufism-is-an-obligation-on-muslims/#comment-26137</link>
		<dc:creator>Saifuddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-26137</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;BismillaharRahmanirRahim

wa 'alaikum as-salaam&lt;/i&gt; Yursil, you wrote:

&lt;blockquote&gt;"One should dwell on this part: “as much as necessary”."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;i&gt;MashaAllah&lt;/i&gt;, thank you for that wise instruction.

-Saifuddin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>BismillaharRahmanirRahim</p>
<p>wa &#8216;alaikum as-salaam</i> Yursil, you wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;One should dwell on this part: “as much as necessary”.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><i>MashaAllah</i>, thank you for that wise instruction.</p>
<p>-Saifuddin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yursil</title>
		<link>http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/sufism-is-an-obligation-on-muslims/#comment-26136</link>
		<dc:creator>Yursil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-26136</guid>
		<description>BismillahirRahmanirRahim
Salamu'alaykum,

There is a lot of subtlety being missed in reading this passage.  

One should dwell on this part: "as much as necessary".  

And even further, we should apply that to what we are discussing here now that the topic is become "who is a Muslim..."

The Imam was not speaking of that divisive topic, rather the quote seems to speaking to the sinfulness of trying to escape from necessary knowledge. 

And this is a state which sometimes too much discussion and not enough wisdom tends to promote, so I'll keep quiet now!

-Yursil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BismillahirRahmanirRahim<br />
Salamu&#8217;alaykum,</p>
<p>There is a lot of subtlety being missed in reading this passage.  </p>
<p>One should dwell on this part: &#8220;as much as necessary&#8221;.  </p>
<p>And even further, we should apply that to what we are discussing here now that the topic is become &#8220;who is a Muslim&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>The Imam was not speaking of that divisive topic, rather the quote seems to speaking to the sinfulness of trying to escape from necessary knowledge. </p>
<p>And this is a state which sometimes too much discussion and not enough wisdom tends to promote, so I&#8217;ll keep quiet now!</p>
<p>-Yursil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saifuddin</title>
		<link>http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/sufism-is-an-obligation-on-muslims/#comment-26132</link>
		<dc:creator>Saifuddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-26132</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;BismillaharRahmanirRahim

wa 'alaikum as-salaam&lt;/i&gt; khudija.

&lt;blockquote&gt;"but i cant agree with u that a person who is not ahl-e-sunnat is not muslim."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I'm not saying, so you are disagreeing with the author of the text I'm citing, which happens to be Imam Abu Hanifa (ra) and Imam Rabbani (ks).

-Saifuddin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>BismillaharRahmanirRahim</p>
<p>wa &#8216;alaikum as-salaam</i> khudija.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;but i cant agree with u that a person who is not ahl-e-sunnat is not muslim.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying, so you are disagreeing with the author of the text I&#8217;m citing, which happens to be Imam Abu Hanifa (ra) and Imam Rabbani (ks).</p>
<p>-Saifuddin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khudija</title>
		<link>http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/sufism-is-an-obligation-on-muslims/#comment-26131</link>
		<dc:creator>khudija</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-26131</guid>
		<description>AOA, saif ur idea is really good about seeking knowledge. but i cant agree with u that a person who is not ahl-e-sunnat is not muslim. it is a dangerous form of sectarianism which is harming us so severly. we are muslim followers of one Allah and one Prophet and we should promot only unity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOA, saif ur idea is really good about seeking knowledge. but i cant agree with u that a person who is not ahl-e-sunnat is not muslim. it is a dangerous form of sectarianism which is harming us so severly. we are muslim followers of one Allah and one Prophet and we should promot only unity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saifuddin</title>
		<link>http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/sufism-is-an-obligation-on-muslims/#comment-26130</link>
		<dc:creator>Saifuddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-26130</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;BismillaharRahmanirRahim

wa 'alaikum as-salaam&lt;/i&gt;. Welcome omyma, clearly you are not understanding many things of this tradition and the beautiful Sunnat of our beloved master Sayyidina Maulana Muhammad (may Peace and Bessings be upon him). So I will ask you this one question and you should answer because it does have serious consequences.

&lt;b&gt;Is Imam Abu Hanifa (ra) wrong?&lt;/b&gt;

In these days we are finding that any and everyone has the freedom to speak. And because of our disconnection with our tradition we, Muslims, are not seeking permission to speak. As a result we Muslims are often misspeaking.

&lt;i&gt;tawba astaghfirullah ya rabbi&lt;/i&gt;. May You allow us to be of the sincere one's. May You guide the sincere one's to &lt;i&gt;siratul mustaqim&lt;/i&gt;. And may the sincere one's hold tightly onto that Rope. &lt;i&gt;amin.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Allah hafiz&lt;/i&gt;

-Saifuddin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>BismillaharRahmanirRahim</p>
<p>wa &#8216;alaikum as-salaam</i>. Welcome omyma, clearly you are not understanding many things of this tradition and the beautiful Sunnat of our beloved master Sayyidina Maulana Muhammad (may Peace and Bessings be upon him). So I will ask you this one question and you should answer because it does have serious consequences.</p>
<p><b>Is Imam Abu Hanifa (ra) wrong?</b></p>
<p>In these days we are finding that any and everyone has the freedom to speak. And because of our disconnection with our tradition we, Muslims, are not seeking permission to speak. As a result we Muslims are often misspeaking.</p>
<p><i>tawba astaghfirullah ya rabbi</i>. May You allow us to be of the sincere one&#8217;s. May You guide the sincere one&#8217;s to <i>siratul mustaqim</i>. And may the sincere one&#8217;s hold tightly onto that Rope. <i>amin.</i></p>
<p><i>Allah hafiz</i></p>
<p>-Saifuddin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omyma</title>
		<link>http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/sufism-is-an-obligation-on-muslims/#comment-26127</link>
		<dc:creator>omyma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-26127</guid>
		<description>Perhaps my comment will be unwelcome, but the words of any Imam should never supercede the Qur'an, which warns us not to follow "al-subul" or "paths" in plural, or we will be lost. Sufism is not only not an obligation in Islam, it is a deviation from Islam. Historically, it is a branch of Shi'a philosophy. There is this tendency to glorify the human over the Almighty, or to seek "wahat al-wujuh" or "unification of face" with God, that is, seeking to somehow become Allah. There are many statements from Sufis that suggest power over that which is the domain of Allah alone. True reverence and submission requires taking the honest position of creature worshipping his Almighty, All-Merciful Creator who is without equal, similar or peer.

Thank you for thinking, seeking.
Alsalamu alaykum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps my comment will be unwelcome, but the words of any Imam should never supercede the Qur&#8217;an, which warns us not to follow &#8220;al-subul&#8221; or &#8220;paths&#8221; in plural, or we will be lost. Sufism is not only not an obligation in Islam, it is a deviation from Islam. Historically, it is a branch of Shi&#8217;a philosophy. There is this tendency to glorify the human over the Almighty, or to seek &#8220;wahat al-wujuh&#8221; or &#8220;unification of face&#8221; with God, that is, seeking to somehow become Allah. There are many statements from Sufis that suggest power over that which is the domain of Allah alone. True reverence and submission requires taking the honest position of creature worshipping his Almighty, All-Merciful Creator who is without equal, similar or peer.</p>
<p>Thank you for thinking, seeking.<br />
Alsalamu alaykum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubbles</title>
		<link>http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/sufism-is-an-obligation-on-muslims/#comment-26125</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-26125</guid>
		<description>Thank you for responding to my comment. I was a bit surprised because I consider myself a Muslim with no particular leanings to any school of thought. You could say I'm all embracing, so long as there are no apparent contradictions.   

Ma Salam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for responding to my comment. I was a bit surprised because I consider myself a Muslim with no particular leanings to any school of thought. You could say I&#8217;m all embracing, so long as there are no apparent contradictions.   </p>
<p>Ma Salam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merazul</title>
		<link>http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/sufism-is-an-obligation-on-muslims/#comment-26122</link>
		<dc:creator>Merazul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wasalaam.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-26122</guid>
		<description>As'salamu 'alaikum, 

The Ulema can differ within a certain Madhab. For example, most Hanafi Scholars are of the opinion that folding the trousers whilst offering Salah is Makrooh-e-Tahreemi, but I have also heard a few who say that it is only Makrooh-e-Tanzeem (can't remember the exact spelling). A modern day example would be the watch. Imam Ahmed Raza Khan Breilly (Rahmathullahi Alay), who was a great Hanafi Scholar of the Sub-continent, was of the opinion that it is not permissible to wear a watch with metal strapping, but there are many Scholars who believe that it is permissible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As&#8217;salamu &#8216;alaikum, </p>
<p>The Ulema can differ within a certain Madhab. For example, most Hanafi Scholars are of the opinion that folding the trousers whilst offering Salah is Makrooh-e-Tahreemi, but I have also heard a few who say that it is only Makrooh-e-Tanzeem (can&#8217;t remember the exact spelling). A modern day example would be the watch. Imam Ahmed Raza Khan Breilly (Rahmathullahi Alay), who was a great Hanafi Scholar of the Sub-continent, was of the opinion that it is not permissible to wear a watch with metal strapping, but there are many Scholars who believe that it is permissible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
